Skip to main content

Don't rush into fixed-rate mortgage, experts suggest as rates rise

16:41:56 EDT Apr 25, 2006
TARA PERKINS
TORONTO (CP) - Tuesday's rise in variable mortgage rates will have some homeowners looking to lock in their rates, but experts say not to be hasty. It could be just a blip.
The cost of a variable mortgage has risen for the sixth time since the summer, after the Bank of Canada announced Tuesday it is hiking its benchmark interest rates by a quarter-point. About 22 per cent of Canadian mortgages are now variable, moving in step with the bank's prime lending rate, says CIBC World Markets (TSX:CM) senior economist Benjamin Tal.
Andrew Moor, CEO of mortgage brokerage firm Invis, says more customers have been opting for fixed-rate mortgages over the last few months as interest rates have risen.
But, he adds, the carrying costs on a variable mortgage are still less than those on a fixed-rate mortgage.
After Tuesday's rate hikes, a competitive variable mortgage rate will be about 4.85 per cent, up from 3.45 per cent at the beginning of September, according to Invis.
As a result, the payments on a $150,000 mortgage will have risen from about $745 a month to about $860.
A five-year fixed mortgage could be obtained at 4.5 per cent in September. That would cost about $830 a month on a $150,000, 25-year mortgage.
Today the rate is more like 5.25 per cent, costing $894, Invis said.
Within hours of the Bank of Canada's announcement Tuesday, mortgage lenders were already posting new variable mortgage rates that were up by a quarter of a percentage point.
"Every time something happens with the rates, there are people who decide, instead of going variable, to go fixed," said Jim Rawson, a regional sales manager for Invis working in downtown Toronto.
But he said economists don't expect the Bank of Canada to continue its credit-tightening policy for much longer.
"It may be a blip in the market and, therefore, you may not need to worry about going into a fixed term if you're used to playing the variable game," he said.
"There's really no need to panic. For those who are finding that it may be a bit of a pinch, there are things like longer amortizations."
He said stretching mortgage payments over a 30-or 35-year window may be a good temporary solution for young homeowners who need to reduce their monthly payments in the short term but know they can increase them in a few years when their salaries are higher.
"It comes down to your risk tolerance," Rawson said of the final decision on fixed-versus-variable mortgages.
"If you're the type of person who is going to lose sleep worrying about rates ... take a fixed-rate mortgage. It's not worth it if you're going to be worrying about it every day. But there are savings to be had with a variable-rate product."
Moor added that steep competition in the Canadian mortgage market has been good news for consumers.
"The pricing of variable-rate mortgages in Canada is becoming very competitive, and in fact Invis has witnessed mortgage lenders battling for market share by offering variable-rate mortgage rates well below prime - discounts not previously seen in the Canadian market," Moor said.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Where to invest in real estate now

"Want to buy a house in Vancouver? Hope you have lots of cash. The average price of a house in Lotus Land hit $490,004 in February. Think about it for a second. That's nearly half a million dollars--and 26.5% higher than a year ago. Put another way, it now takes a household income of $142,000 a year to comfortably purchase a place to live. Wasn't the real estate market supposed to slow down this year? Apparently not. And it's not just Vancouver that's experiencing double-digit price increases so far this year. Canadian Real Estate Association (CREA) figures show the average home price from February 2005 to February 2006 rose 26% in Calgary and 15.5% in Edmonton, both economic boomtowns of late. But even relatively moribund Toronto saw an increase of nearly 6%, for an average price of almost $354,000. That's a lot of money to put on the line if you're thinking of investing in the real estate market--let alone looking for a place to live. No wonder people are...

Reverse mortgage can pump up your retirement pay

"QUESTION: My husband and I are retired with a total annual income of $40,000. We owe $145,000 on our home, which is worth $475,000. We don't have any extra to play with. We would like to know whether you would advise us to consider a reverse mortgage. ANSWER: A reverse mortgage could pay off your existing mortgage and eliminate the monthly mortgage payments you are currently paying. This could free up some income for you to play with each month. Here's essentially how it would work. A reverse mortgage would pay off your existing mortgage balance of $145,000. Then, rather than having to make monthly interest and principal payments, the interest charged on the loan would simply add to the balance of the loan. Let's assume your home will appreciate by 4 percent in the coming years, and the reverse mortgage interest rate averages 6 percent. Ten years from now, your home is worth $703,000 and the balance on the reverse mortgage is $260,000. In 20 years, your home is worth ...